grandtitikkumpul.com

Travel & Mobility · AI Visibility

AI Visibility Check · Free 82-point audit ·

68/100
AI Visibility · Good
C
Grade

grandtitikkumpul.com scored 68/100 (Good)on GeoCore AI's free AI visibility check (). Audited 82 checks: 39 passed, 29 warnings, 10 failures. grandtitikkumpul.com passed 39/82 AI visibility checks. GEO score: 68/100. Free check powered by GeoCore AI.

68
out of 100
Good
39Passed
29Warnings
10Critical Failures
3Skipped
AI mentions you?
2.3K mentions
118 citation sources
vs. CR One Group
📊
68vs82
14 pts behind
Opportunities
🕳️
33 issues to fix
🟡 Critical
🏥 GEO / SEO / AEO Health Check
Live data
GEO Health
AI Generative Engine Optimization
View 35
64/100
AI Generative Engine Optimization · 35 checks
⚠️AI Search Bots Allowed
llms.txt Present
llms.txt Consistency
⚠️IndexNow Enabled
⚠️Perplexity Hub Listed
⚠️AI Agent Config
Agent-Readable Schema
llms.txt Agent Navigation
⚠️Turn-1 Content Optimization
⚠️Multi-Platform Citation Fit
⚠️ai.txt Present
⚠️AI Plugin Manifest
⚠️Citation Readiness (5W)
Brand Mention Consistency
⚠️Comparison Table
Ranking / List Density
⚠️Calculator / Interactive Tool
Content Extractability
Statistics Density
Question Headings (Site-wide)
Plain-Text Q&A Pairs
⚠️Plain-Text Step Instructions
Category-Specific Optimization
Brand Knowledge Consolidation
Freshness Signal (Enhanced)
Sub-Intent Coverage
Industry Detection (F3)
AI Overview Readiness (E4)
⚠️AI Readability (E5) (LLM, unified)
Content Readability (LAURAE) (LLM, unified)
Title Uniqueness (site-wide)
⚠️Answer Near the Top
⚠️Factually Specific
⚠️Content Length
⚠️Preview Control
SEO Health
Traditional Search Engine Score
View 16
81/100
Traditional Search Engine Score · 16 checks
robots.txt Exists
robots.txt Format Valid
Sitemap Declared in robots.txt
sitemap.xml Exists
⚠️humans.txt Present
Google Indexing Signal
Bing Indexing Signal
Canonical Consistency
Meta Description Quality
HTTPS Enabled
Title Consistency
⚠️Image Performance (WebP/AVIF/srcset/lazy)
Image Alt Quality
⚠️Core Web Vitals (E2) (local probe)
Social Card (OG/Twitter)
⚠️Mobile Friendliness
AEO Health
Answer Engine Optimization
View 21
64/100
Answer Engine Optimization · 21 checks
Article Content Identified
Article Schema Markup
FAQ Schema Quality
Organization Schema
BreadcrumbList Schema
Answer Capsule Content
Internal Links (Outbound)
Inbound Link Quality (rule estimate)
⚠️HowTo Schema Present
⚠️E-E-A-T Signals
⚠️Content Spam Compliance
High-Value AI Content Signals
⚠️Product Schema Present
⚠️Review / Rating Schema
Authoritative Outbound Links
⚠️Original Data Signal
⚠️Wikidata Entity Presence
ImageObject Schema (E3)
Accessibility (WCAG)
Schema JSON-LD Validation (E1)
Voice Search Readiness

Full Scan Results · 82 Checks

All 82 checks across 12 categories — including passed and skipped items.

🤖

AI Crawl Infrastructure

(11 checks 5 pass, 2 warn, 1 fail, 3 skip)

sitemap.xml Exists

sitemap.xml not found (404)

Fix: Create a sitemap.xml and submit it to Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

AI Search Bots Allowed

Only GPTBot configured — OAI-SearchBot (OpenAI's search crawler) missing

Fix: Add explicit "User-agent: OAI-SearchBot" Allow:/ rules. OAI-SearchBot now outnumbers GPTBot and controls ChatGPT search citations. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

humans.txt Present

humans.txt not found (optional but supports E-E-A-T)

Fix: Create /humans.txt with team info, contact details, and update date. Helps AI engines verify authorship and expertise signals.

Warning

sitemap.xml Format Valid

Cannot check — sitemap.xml not available

Skipped

sitemap.xml Has <lastmod>

Cannot check — sitemap.xml not available

Skipped

No Dead Links in Sitemap

Cannot check — sitemap.xml not available

Skipped

robots.txt Exists

robots.txt found and accessible

Passed

robots.txt Format Valid

robots.txt has valid User-agent directives

Passed

Sitemap Declared in robots.txt

Sitemap declared: https://grandtitikkumpul.com/sitemap-index.xml

Passed

llms.txt Present

llms.txt found — proactive AI crawler guidance in place

Passed

llms.txt Consistency

Both llms.txt and llms-full.txt are present and accessible

Passed
🔍

Discovery & Indexing

(4 checks 2 pass, 2 warn)

IndexNow Enabled

IndexNow key file not found

Fix: Implement IndexNow to instantly notify Bing, Yandex, and other engines about new/updated pages.

Warning

Perplexity Hub Listed

No Perplexity Hub registration detected

Fix: Register your site on Perplexity Hub (hub.perplexity.ai) to improve AI search visibility.

Warning

Google Indexing Signal

Homepage is accessible (Google crawl likely possible)

Passed

Bing Indexing Signal

No Bingbot restrictions in robots.txt

Passed
📝

Content & Schema

(14 checks 9 pass, 3 warn, 2 fail)

Article Schema Markup

No Article schema markup detected on homepage or scanned content pages

Fix: Add JSON-LD Article schema to your content pages to help AI understand your content type. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

FAQ Schema Quality

No FAQ schema detected

Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD schema with 8-10 Q&As (each 100+ chars). FAQ schema is one of the strongest signals for AI answer extraction. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

HowTo Schema Present

No HowTo schema detected

Fix: Add HowTo JSON-LD schema to tutorial/guide pages. AI engines prominently feature step-by-step content with HowTo markup. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

E-E-A-T Signals

2/4 E-E-A-T signals detected (Authority, Trust). Missing: Experience, Expertise

Fix: Google March 2026 Core Update strengthened E-E-A-T weighting. Add signals for: Experience, Expertise. AI engines (Perplexity, ChatGPT) prioritize citing E-E-A-T-strong content. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

Content Spam Compliance

Low-risk spam signals detected: meeting, incentive, conference, exhibiti

Fix: Review and clean up potentially spammy phrases. AI-generated content must provide genuine value to avoid SpamBrain penalties.

Warning

Article Content Identified

Article-like content detected (blog, post, <main)

Passed

Organization Schema

Organization/LocalBusiness schema found

Passed

BreadcrumbList Schema

BreadcrumbList schema found

Passed

Answer Capsule Content

Direct answer-style content detected (LLM, unified): The page immediately states it is the official web for rafting Cisadane Bogor with price and location.

Passed

Internal Links (Outbound)

43 internal links found on homepage

Passed

Canonical Consistency

Canonical consistent and single (https://grandtitikkumpul.com/)

Passed

Inbound Link Quality (rule estimate)

Rule-based estimate: canonical present, 46 internal links found. Real backlink/referring-domain data requires FullScan (paid unlock).

Fix: 🔒 Unlock real backlink analysis (referring domains, spam score, broken links) with FullScan. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Passed

Meta Description Quality

Meta description found (149 chars): "Official Web Grand Titik Kumpul - tempat rafting Cisadane Bo..."

Passed

High-Value AI Content Signals

Content has 3/3 quality signals (LLM, unified): Definition: Grand Titik Kumpul is described as official web tempat rafting Cisadane Bogor and wisata air lengkap., Data points: Price Rp 175.000, distance 11 KM, river class I-III, age minimum 8 years, capacity 20-500 people, 15+ years experience., Citations: Mentions official web, WhatsApp, Instagram, and warns about fake accounts.

Passed

Technical Signals

(4 checks 2 pass, 1 warn, 1 info)

Product Schema Present

No Product schema detected

Fix: Add Product JSON-LD schema (with name, description, offers) to product/pricing pages to improve AI recommendation visibility. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

Page Speed (TTFB)

TTFB: 8835ms (probe reference; network/concurrency-affected, indicative only)

Fix: This is a single probe measurement, not authoritative. For real-user speed, see Core Web Vitals (#73, CrUX field data). 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Info

HTTPS Enabled

Site uses HTTPS: https://grandtitikkumpul.com/

Passed

Title Consistency

Title and og:title match: "OFFICIAL WEB GRAND TITIK KUMPUL TEMPAT RAFTING CIS"

Passed
🤝

AI Agent Visibility

(3 checks 2 pass, 1 warn)

AI Agent Config

No AI agent configuration detected (ai-plugin.json, agent.json)

Fix: Create /.well-known/ai-plugin.json to make your service discoverable by AI agents (ChatGPT Plugins, OpenAI GPTs). 81% of companies still treat AI agents as generic bots — early movers gain significant visibility.

Warning

Agent-Readable Schema

Structured data types for AI agents detected (Service/Product/Action schema).

Passed

llms.txt Agent Navigation

llms.txt has sections and URLs — well-structured for AI agent navigation.

Passed
🌐

Multi-Platform Citation

(2 checks 2 warn)

Turn-1 Content Optimization

Only partial Turn-1 optimization found (LLM, unified)

Fix: Add "What is [Brand]?" or "How does [Brand] work?" as H1/H2. Turn-1 citations are 2.5× more likely than Turn-10.

Warning

Multi-Platform Citation Fit

2/5 AI platform signals covered

Fix: Missing: Perplexity: add article:modified_time meta tag; Gemini: embed YouTube video or add VideoObject schema; Claude: add technical docs / code examples 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning
🔎

AI Discoverability

(4 checks 1 pass, 3 warn)

ai.txt Present

ai.txt not found — AI agents lack explicit permission/usage directives

Fix: Create /ai.txt to declare which AI agents can use your content, usage restrictions, and attribution requirements. Emerging standard adopted by major AI companies.

Warning

AI Plugin Manifest

No AI plugin manifest found at /.well-known/ai-plugin.json

Fix: Create an AI plugin manifest to enable GPT Actions and AI agent integrations. This allows AI assistants to discover and interact with your site's functionality. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

Citation Readiness (5W)

4/5 citation signals found (LLM, unified) — missing: When (publication/update date)

Fix: Add missing signals to improve AI citation probability: When (publication/update date)

Warning

Brand Mention Consistency

Brand "grandtitikkumpul" appears 17x (20.1/1000 words) with consistent usage

Passed
📈

Citation Enhancement (v3)

(16 checks 6 pass, 6 warn, 4 fail)

Authoritative Outbound Links

No authoritative source links found

Fix: Cite peer-reviewed research, government data, or academic sources. AI models cross-reference authoritative links when generating answers. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Question Headings (Site-wide)

No question-style headings found

Fix: Add FAQ-style headings matching real user queries. DataForSEO research shows question headings significantly improve AI answer matching. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Plain-Text Q&A Pairs

No question-answer pairs found

Fix: Structure key content as FAQ sections with question headings and short answers under 300 characters. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Freshness Signal (Enhanced)

No publication or update date found on page or in sitemap

Fix: Add <lastmod> to sitemap XML AND visible "Last Updated" date with article:modified_time meta tag. AI engines strongly prefer fresh content (50% citations from ≤13 weeks). 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Comparison Table

No comparison table found on page

Fix: Add a comparison table highlighting your advantages vs alternatives. AI engines heavily cite comparison data.

Warning

Calculator / Interactive Tool

No calculator or interactive tool detected — consider adding one for engagement

Fix: Public calculators and estimation tools get ~39% more AI citations in finance/health/saas categories.

Warning

Review / Rating Schema

No Review or AggregateRating schema detected

Fix: Add AggregateRating schema to product/service pages. AI engines use review data as a recommendation signal. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

Original Data Signal

No original/proprietary data signal detected (LLM, unified)

Fix: Publish original research, proprietary statistics, or a documented methodology.

Warning

Plain-Text Step Instructions

No step-by-step instructions found

Fix: Add numbered step-by-step guides for how-to content. AI models prefer procedural content with clear sequential steps.

Warning

Wikidata Entity Presence

No Wikidata/Wikipedia reference detected — add one to strengthen knowledge-graph entity recognition

Fix: Create a Wikidata entry for your brand and add the Q-item ID to Organization schema sameAs. Wikipedia is the #1 cited source by ChatGPT (~7.8% of all citations).

Warning

Ranking / List Density

2 list(s) with 12 items across scanned pages — good density for AI scanning

Passed

Content Extractability

Substantial text in raw HTML (461 words) — AI crawlable without JS execution

Passed

Statistics Density

Concrete, credible statistics found on scanned pages (LLM, unified)

Passed

Category-Specific Optimization

Category detected: travel (confidence 0.98) — category-aware checks active

Fix: Category identified; industry-specific optimization guidance will deepen after onboarding.

Passed

Brand Knowledge Consolidation

4 official platform profile(s) — strong brand knowledge foundation

Passed

Sub-Intent Coverage

5 sub-intent(s) covered (LLM, unified): activities, contact, location, pricing, safety

Passed
🖼

Image & Visual (E3)

(4 checks 2 pass, 2 warn)

Image Performance (WebP/AVIF/srcset/lazy)

Partially optimized images (1 missing: no width/height (CLS risk))

Fix: Use WebP/AVIF, add srcset+sizes (picture fallback), loading=lazy + decoding=async, and explicit width/height to prevent CLS. Add ImageObject schema for AI/vision crawlers.

Warning

Core Web Vitals (E2) (local probe)

Local probe (TTFB): 8835ms — could be improved (CrUX/PSI unavailable, using scan-time avg TTFB)

Fix: Improve server response time (TTFB) — use CDN/edge caching and optimize backend. Real-user data will confirm after sufficient traffic.

Warning

Image Alt Quality

All 9 images have alt text (or empty alt for decorative) (9 images, 0 missing)

Passed

ImageObject Schema (E3)

ImageObject schema present (helps AI/vision crawlers understand images)

Passed
📋

Site Quality (v5)

(7 checks 5 pass, 1 warn, 1 fail)

Voice Search Readiness

Voice Search not optimized (45/100) (LLM, unified)

Fix: Add Speakable/FAQ schema, put a concise direct answer near the top (<=40 words), and use conversational phrasing. Voice/AI search favors short, quotable answers.

Failed

Mobile Friendliness

10 small touch targets detected (min 48x48px per WCAG 2.2)

Fix: Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">, use font-size >= 16px, and ensure touch targets are >= 48x48px (WCAG 2.2 2.5.8). Full audit via Lighthouse mobile audit is recommended.

Warning

Social Card (OG/Twitter)

Social Card present with OG tags (og:title/desc/image)

Passed

Accessibility (WCAG)

Accessibility base checks passed (labels, headings, contrast, ARIA)

Passed

Industry Detection (F3)

Industry detected: travel (Perplexity, confidence 0.98)

Passed

Schema JSON-LD Validation (E1)

All 4 JSON-LD blocks valid (4 types: BreadcrumbList, LocalBusiness, Organization, WebSite)

Passed

AI Overview Readiness (E4)

AI Overview readiness: 86/100 [ai_crawl=20.0, answer_first=20.0, schema=20.0, citable=18.0, unique=8.0] (LLM, unified)

Passed
🧠

AI Readability (E5)

(2 checks 1 warn, 1 fail)

Content Readability (LAURAE) (LLM, unified)

No readable text found on page — Flesch 0.0 — Fog 0.0 — ARI 0.0

Fix: Add actual readable content to the page.

Failed

AI Readability (E5) (LLM, unified)

Partially AI-readable (E5 66.2/100) (LLM) (unified) — Macro 0.65 / Meso 0.7 / Micro 0.7 · cited-prob 66%

Fix: Restructure for AI scanning: put an answer-first opening under H1, use a strict H1→H2→H3 hierarchy with balanced paragraphs, add bulleted key points, a comparison table, an early stats block, bold signals, an FAQ section, and semantic tags (article/section/main).

Warning
📁

Multi-Page Aggregation

(8 checks 4 pass, 4 warn)

Answer Near the Top

No direct answer signal in first 30% of content

Fix: Lead with the core answer in the first 30%% of text. CXL research: 55%% of AI citations come from the first 30%% of content.

Warning

Factually Specific

Low factual density: 0.43 data points per 200 words (need >=1)

Fix: Add more specific facts, statistics, percentages, or concrete figures. Studies show content with data gets ~40%% more AI citations.

Warning

Content Length

Content length 461 words (decent, aim >=800 for in-depth)

Fix: Expand content to at least 800 words. Token-dense pages let an LLM extract a complete answer.

Warning

Preview Control

Partial preview control — missing: FAQ markup

Fix: Meta description, first paragraph, and FAQ schema control what AI previews. Add the missing: FAQ markup.

Warning

Title Uniqueness (site-wide)

All page titles unique across 1 page(s)

Passed

Citation Worthiness

AI citation-worthiness 7/10 (LLM, unified): Provides clear, specific details about rafting packages, location, and safety, making it a credible source for basic info.

Passed

Answer Completeness

Answer completeness 7/10 (LLM, unified) — gaps: No specific opening hours or seasonal availability., No detailed itinerary or duration of rafting trip.

Passed

Contradiction Risk

No contradiction/misleading signals detected (LLM, unified)

Passed

38 checks passed

AI Reputation & Platform Citation

AI Reputation Score44.3

Risk level: high

Limited public reviews or complaints specifically tied to Grand Titik Kumpul

AI systems would likely say there is not enough third-party review volume to verify service quality, so any strong positive or negative claim should be treated cautiously. They would usually point users to official channels and ask for recent customer reviews before judging reliability.

Potential confusion with other rafting and travel operators in Bogor, especially CR One Group

AI platforms would likely note that Grand Titik Kumpul appears in the same adventure-tourism space as other Bogor rafting brands, including CR One Group, so users may confuse operators or compare packages incorrectly. They would typically recommend checking the exact business name, location, and contact details before booking.

Heavy reliance on owned social and website content rather than independent coverage

AI platforms would likely describe the brand using its own website and social profiles, emphasizing rafting, outbound, camping, and gathering services. They would not have much independent evidence to assess reputation and would frame the brand as a local adventure-tourism provider with limited external validation.

🤖 Platform Sentiment

claude😐 neutral

Limited information available. It would likely characterize the brand as a local travel and outdoor activity provider in Bogor, with little independent reputation data surfaced.

gemini😐 neutral

Limited information available. It would likely summarize Grand Titik Kumpul as an Indonesian rafting and group-outing business and note that most visible information comes from owned channels.

chatgpt😐 neutral

Limited information available beyond the brand’s own site and social profiles. It would likely describe Grand Titik Kumpul as a Bogor-based adventure and rafting operator offering rafting, outbound, camping, and gathering packages.

perplexity😐 neutral

Limited information available. It would likely present the company as a Bogor adventure-tourism operator focused on rafting, camping, outbound, and event packages, while noting sparse third-party coverage.

Platform Breakdown
Live data
YouCR One Group
Platform
Mentions
Citations
Sentiment
Top3 Rank
Comp. Mentions
Comp. Citations
ChatGPT
8
6
😊 pos
🔒
11
7
Perplexity
7
4
😊 pos
🔒
3
2
Gemini
120
0
😐 neutral
🔒
13.8K
5
Claude
340
85
😐 neutral
🔒
1.2K
310
Grok
1.8K
23
😊 pos
🔒
3.9K
41
Total
2.3K
118 src
19.0K
365 src

📡 5-Platform Crawler Access Radar

Robots.txt access permission per AI platform crawler (ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity / Grok / Claude). Citation-diversity dimension requires a full scan.

🤖 AI Agent Visibility Score
Agent Config + Schema + llms.txt Navigation (#32-#34)
83
ChatGPT
50🔒
Gemini
50🔒
Perplexity
50🔒
Grok
50🔒
Claude
50🔒

🛰 AI Overview Citation

Live Google AIO
3/3
Queries Citing You
#1
Best Position
3
Total Citations
AIO: Grand Titik Kumpul is cited in 3/3 AI Overview answers — best position #1 in citations
Detected AI Overview Citations
What is Grand Titik Kumpul and what does it do?✓ Cited
How does Grand Titik Kumpul compare to alternatives in 2026?✓ Cited
What are the pros and cons of Grand Titik Kumpul?✓ Cited
🔒 Unlock Full AI Citation Insights
🔒AI Citation Context
Where & how AI cites you
🔒Gemini Visibility
Google's own model citations
🔒Global AIO Tracking
Multi-country, multi-language
🔒AIO Trend
Citation changes over time
🔍
Google Index
Indexed — 10 pages found via site: search
10 pages
🅱️
Bing Index
Indexed — 3 pages found via site: search
3 pages
📈 Industry Insights
📡 Top Cited Sources
1reddit.com8%
2americanexpress.com8%
3wanderwithlaura.com4%
4saltyluxe.com4%
5community.ricksteves.com4%
🔥 Hot Keywords
travelgoogle flights search anywheregoogle flights apptravel sitestravel gametravel googletravel definetravel bookingmulti city google flightstravel flights

💬 Reddit Mentions

🔥 Trending Questions

What is the best AI prompt for planning a multi-day trip with budget, flights, and activities?
Search index: 88
Which travel destinations are trending for 2026 family vacations?
Search index: 82
How can I use AI to build a personalized travel itinerary faster?
Search index: 76

❄️ Underserved Questions

What is the best travel agency for custom group itineraries in Costa Rica?
Search index: 44
How do I compare private tour operators for small group travel support?
Search index: 37
Which travel company offers free trip planning with human support?
Search index: 29

About This Audit

Is grandtitikkumpul.com visible to AI search engines?

grandtitikkumpul.com scored 68/100 (Good) on GeoCore AI's free AI visibility check as of September 2, 2026. Results: 39 passed, 29 warnings, 10 failures out of 82 checks. grandtitikkumpul.com passed 39/82 AI visibility checks. GEO score: 68/100. Free check powered by GeoCore AI.

Does grandtitikkumpul.com have llms.txt?

Yes — grandtitikkumpul.com has a valid llms.txt file, making it directly readable by AI language models like ChatGPT and Claude.

How can grandtitikkumpul.com improve its AI visibility?

  • Create a sitemap.xml and submit it to Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools.
  • Add JSON-LD Article schema to your content pages to help AI understand your content type.
  • Add FAQPage JSON-LD schema with 8-10 Q&As (each 100+ chars). FAQ schema is one of the strongest signals for AI answer extraction.
  • Cite peer-reviewed research, government data, or academic sources. AI models cross-reference authoritative links when generating answers.
  • Add FAQ-style headings matching real user queries. DataForSEO research shows question headings significantly improve AI answer matching.
  • Structure key content as FAQ sections with question headings and short answers under 300 characters.
  • Add <lastmod> to sitemap XML AND visible "Last Updated" date with article:modified_time meta tag. AI engines strongly prefer fresh content (50% citations from ≤13 weeks).
  • Add Speakable/FAQ schema, put a concise direct answer near the top (<=40 words), and use conversational phrasing. Voice/AI search favors short, quotable answers.
  • Add actual readable content to the page.

What does this 82-point check cover?

82 checks across 12 dimensions: AI Crawl Infrastructure (11 checks); Discovery & Indexing (4 checks); Content & Schema (14 checks); Technical Signals (4 checks); AI Agent Visibility (3 checks); Multi-Platform Citation (2 checks); AI Discoverability (4 checks); Citation Enhancement (v3) (16 checks); Image & Visual (E3) (4 checks); Site Quality (v5) (7 checks); AI Readability (E5) (2 checks); Multi-Page Aggregation (4 checks).

How do I make my site get cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Grok & Google AI?

The best way to improve your AI visibility is with a continuous optimization loop: (1) run a free GeoCore AI check to find gaps like missing llms.txt or weak structured data, (2) fix the highest-impact issues, then (3) monitor how your citations change as AI engines index your site. GeoCore AI tracks this for you so you can see real progress toward being cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, and Google AI Overview.

Get cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude & Google AI

Run a free AI visibility checkfor your own domain, fix the gaps, then track your citations climbing with GeoCore AI's full GEO platform.