reuters.com

News & Media · AI Visibility

AI Visibility Check · Free 82-point audit ·

40/100
AI Visibility · At Risk
D
Grade

reuters.com scored 40/100 (Fair)on GeoCore AI's free AI visibility check (). Audited 82 checks: 15 passed, 29 warnings, 28 failures. reuters.com passed 15/82 AI visibility checks. GEO score: 40/100. Free check powered by GeoCore AI.

40
out of 100
Fair
15Passed
29Warnings
28Critical Failures
5Skipped
AI mentions you?
1M mentions
668K citation sources
vs. Bloomberg
📊
40vs92
52 pts behind
Opportunities
🕳️
52 issues to fix
🟡 Critical
🏥 GEO / SEO / AEO Health Check
Live data
GEO Health
AI Generative Engine Optimization
View 33
31/100
AI Generative Engine Optimization · 33 checks
AI Search Bots Allowed
⚠️llms.txt Present
⚠️IndexNow Enabled
⚠️Perplexity Hub Listed
⚠️AI Agent Config
⚠️Agent-Readable Schema
llms.txt Agent Navigation
Turn-1 Content Optimization
Multi-Platform Citation Fit
⚠️ai.txt Present
⚠️AI Plugin Manifest
Citation Readiness (5W)
Brand Mention Consistency
⚠️Comparison Table
Ranking / List Density
⚠️Calculator / Interactive Tool
Content Extractability
Statistics Density
Question Headings (Site-wide)
Plain-Text Q&A Pairs
⚠️Plain-Text Step Instructions
Category-Specific Optimization
Brand Knowledge Consolidation
Freshness Signal (Enhanced)
Sub-Intent Coverage
Industry Detection (F3)
AI Overview Readiness (E4)
AI Readability (E5) (LLM, unified)
Content Readability (LAURAE) (LLM, unified)
Title Uniqueness (site-wide)
⚠️Factually Specific
⚠️Content Length
⚠️Preview Control
SEO Health
Traditional Search Engine Score
View 15
63/100
Traditional Search Engine Score · 15 checks
robots.txt Exists
robots.txt Format Valid
Sitemap Declared in robots.txt
⚠️sitemap.xml Exists
Google Indexing Signal
Bing Indexing Signal
Canonical Consistency
Meta Description Quality
HTTPS Enabled
Title Consistency
Image Performance (WebP/AVIF/srcset/lazy)
Image Alt Quality
⚠️Core Web Vitals (E2) (local probe)
Social Card (OG/Twitter)
⚠️Mobile Friendliness
AEO Health
Answer Engine Optimization
View 21
35/100
Answer Engine Optimization · 21 checks
⚠️Article Content Identified
Article Schema Markup
FAQ Schema Quality
⚠️Organization Schema
⚠️BreadcrumbList Schema
⚠️Answer Capsule Content
Internal Links (Outbound)
⚠️Inbound Link Quality (rule estimate)
⚠️HowTo Schema Present
E-E-A-T Signals
Content Spam Compliance
⚠️High-Value AI Content Signals
⚠️Product Schema Present
⚠️Review / Rating Schema
Authoritative Outbound Links
⚠️Original Data Signal
⚠️Wikidata Entity Presence
⚠️ImageObject Schema (E3)
⚠️Accessibility (WCAG)
Schema JSON-LD Validation (E1)
Voice Search Readiness

Full Scan Results · 82 Checks

All 82 checks across 12 categories — including passed and skipped items.

🤖

AI Crawl Infrastructure

(11 checks 3 pass, 2 warn, 1 fail, 5 skip)

AI Search Bots Allowed

3 AI search bot(s) blocked: PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, ClaudeBot

Fix: CRITICAL: Remove Disallow:/ for PerplexityBot. Search bots directly control AI citation ability. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

sitemap.xml Exists

sitemap.xml returned status 401

Fix: Ensure sitemap.xml is publicly accessible. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

llms.txt Present

llms.txt returned status 401 (optional enhancement)

Fix: Ensure llms.txt is publicly accessible at your domain root. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

sitemap.xml Format Valid

Cannot check — sitemap.xml not available

Skipped

sitemap.xml Has <lastmod>

Cannot check — sitemap.xml not available

Skipped

No Dead Links in Sitemap

Cannot check — sitemap.xml not available

Skipped

llms.txt Consistency

llms.txt not present — consistency check skipped (non-critical)

Skipped

humans.txt Present

humans.txt check skipped (status 401)

Skipped

robots.txt Exists

robots.txt found and accessible

Passed

robots.txt Format Valid

robots.txt has valid User-agent directives

Passed

Sitemap Declared in robots.txt

Sitemap declared: https://www.reuters.com/arc/outboundfeeds/sitemap-index/?outputType=xml

Passed
🔍

Discovery & Indexing

(4 checks 2 pass, 2 warn)

IndexNow Enabled

IndexNow key file not found

Fix: Implement IndexNow to instantly notify Bing, Yandex, and other engines about new/updated pages.

Warning

Perplexity Hub Listed

No Perplexity Hub registration detected

Fix: Register your site on Perplexity Hub (hub.perplexity.ai) to improve AI search visibility.

Warning

Google Indexing Signal

Homepage is accessible (Google crawl likely possible)

Passed

Bing Indexing Signal

Bingbot allowed in robots.txt

Passed
📝

Content & Schema

(14 checks 1 pass, 7 warn, 6 fail)

Article Schema Markup

No Article schema markup detected on homepage or scanned content pages

Fix: Add JSON-LD Article schema to your content pages to help AI understand your content type. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

FAQ Schema Quality

No FAQ schema detected

Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD schema with 8-10 Q&As (each 100+ chars). FAQ schema is one of the strongest signals for AI answer extraction. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Internal Links (Outbound)

No internal links detected

Fix: Add internal links to connect your content and improve AI crawler navigation. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Canonical Consistency

No rel=canonical tag found

Fix: Add a self-referencing canonical tag: <link rel="canonical" href="PAGE_URL"/>. Google uses it to consolidate duplicate URLs and it helps AI crawlers identify the authoritative version. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Meta Description Quality

No meta description found

Fix: Add a compelling meta description (50-160 chars) to every page. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

E-E-A-T Signals

Only 0/4 E-E-A-T signals detected. Missing: Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

Fix: CRITICAL: Low E-E-A-T hurts both Google rankings and AI citation rates. Add author credentials, first-person experience, trust signals (privacy/contact), and authority references (press mentions, certifications). 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Article Content Identified

No clear article content structure detected

Fix: Structure your content using proper semantic HTML and Schema.org Article markup. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

Organization Schema

No Organization schema detected

Fix: Add Organization JSON-LD schema to establish entity recognition with AI systems. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

BreadcrumbList Schema

No BreadcrumbList schema detected

Fix: Add BreadcrumbList schema to improve content hierarchy understanding by AI crawlers. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

Answer Capsule Content

No clear answer capsule content detected (LLM, unified)

Fix: Add concise, direct answer paragraphs at the top of key pages to improve AI citation potential.

Warning

Inbound Link Quality (rule estimate)

Rule-based estimate: 0 internal links, canonical missing. Real backlink/referring-domain data requires FullScan (paid unlock).

Fix: 🔒 Unlock real backlink analysis (referring domains, spam score, broken links) with FullScan. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

HowTo Schema Present

No HowTo schema detected

Fix: Add HowTo JSON-LD schema to tutorial/guide pages. AI engines prominently feature step-by-step content with HowTo markup. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

High-Value AI Content Signals

Only 1/3 quality signals detected (LLM, unified)

Fix: Add statistics, expert citations, and clear definitions.

Warning

Content Spam Compliance

No Google SpamBrain risk signals detected. Content appears compliant.

Passed

Technical Signals

(4 checks 1 pass, 1 warn, 1 fail)

Title Consistency

No page title found

Fix: Add a unique, descriptive <title> tag to every page. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Product Schema Present

No Product schema detected

Fix: Add Product JSON-LD schema (with name, description, offers) to product/pricing pages to improve AI recommendation visibility. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

HTTPS Enabled

Site uses HTTPS: https://reuters.com/

Passed
🤝

AI Agent Visibility

(3 checks 2 warn, 1 fail)

llms.txt Agent Navigation

No llms.txt — AI agents cannot efficiently discover your content

Fix: Create /llms.txt following llmstxt.org format. Only 19% of websites have AI agent-specific instructions; this is a key differentiator.

Failed

AI Agent Config

No AI agent configuration detected (ai-plugin.json, agent.json)

Fix: Create /.well-known/ai-plugin.json to make your service discoverable by AI agents (ChatGPT Plugins, OpenAI GPTs). 81% of companies still treat AI agents as generic bots — early movers gain significant visibility.

Warning

Agent-Readable Schema

No Agent-compatible Schema types found

Fix: Add Service/SoftwareApplication/Action JSON-LD schema. AI agents use structured data to understand your capabilities. AI Agent traffic now equals 88% of human organic search.

Warning
🌐

Multi-Platform Citation

(2 checks 2 fail)

Turn-1 Content Optimization

No Turn-1 optimization signals found (LLM, unified)

Fix: Add a clear definition and question-style heading near the top of the page.

Failed

Multi-Platform Citation Fit

Only 0/5 AI platform signals — highly undifferentiated

Fix: Each AI platform cites different content types. ChatGPT→authority schema; Perplexity→fresh content; Gemini→YouTube; Grok→twitter:card; Claude→tech docs. Only 7% of content cited across all platforms universally. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed
🔎

AI Discoverability

(4 checks 1 pass, 2 warn, 1 fail)

Citation Readiness (5W)

Only 0/5 citation signals found (LLM, unified) — low citation probability

Fix: Add Who (author), What (description), When (date), Where (location), How (methodology) signals. AI engines prefer content with clear provenance and structure.

Failed

ai.txt Present

ai.txt not found — AI agents lack explicit permission/usage directives

Fix: Create /ai.txt to declare which AI agents can use your content, usage restrictions, and attribution requirements. Emerging standard adopted by major AI companies.

Warning

AI Plugin Manifest

No AI plugin manifest found at /.well-known/ai-plugin.json

Fix: Create an AI plugin manifest to enable GPT Actions and AI agent integrations. This allows AI assistants to discover and interact with your site's functionality. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

Brand Mention Consistency

Brand "reuters" appears 1x (76.9/1000 words) with consistent usage

Passed
📈

Citation Enhancement (v3)

(16 checks 2 pass, 6 warn, 8 fail)

Ranking / List Density

No structured lists found

Fix: Add at least one ranked or comparison list. DataForSEO research: WalletHub-style rankings increase AI citations by ~95%. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Authoritative Outbound Links

No authoritative source links found

Fix: Cite peer-reviewed research, government data, or academic sources. AI models cross-reference authoritative links when generating answers. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Content Extractability

Near-empty raw HTML (13 words) — JS-rendered shell with little crawlable content

Fix: Enable server-side rendering (SSR) or pre-rendering. AI crawlers like ChatGPT/Gemini cannot execute JavaScript. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Statistics Density

No quantitative data found (LLM, unified)

Fix: Include specific numbers, percentages, and statistical claims backed by sources.

Failed

Question Headings (Site-wide)

No question-style headings found

Fix: Add FAQ-style headings matching real user queries. DataForSEO research shows question headings significantly improve AI answer matching. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Plain-Text Q&A Pairs

No question-answer pairs found

Fix: Structure key content as FAQ sections with question headings and short answers under 300 characters. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Brand Knowledge Consolidation

0 official platform profile(s) — insufficient brand presence signals

Fix: Create official profiles on LinkedIn, Twitter/X, and industry-specific platforms. Add them as sameAs links in your Organization schema.

Failed

Freshness Signal (Enhanced)

No publication or update date found on page or in sitemap

Fix: Add <lastmod> to sitemap XML AND visible "Last Updated" date with article:modified_time meta tag. AI engines strongly prefer fresh content (50% citations from ≤13 weeks). 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Failed

Comparison Table

No comparison table found on page

Fix: Add a comparison table highlighting your advantages vs alternatives. AI engines heavily cite comparison data.

Warning

Calculator / Interactive Tool

No calculator or interactive tool detected — consider adding one for engagement

Fix: Public calculators and estimation tools get ~39% more AI citations in finance/health/saas categories.

Warning

Review / Rating Schema

No Review or AggregateRating schema detected

Fix: Add AggregateRating schema to product/service pages. AI engines use review data as a recommendation signal. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

Warning

Original Data Signal

No original/proprietary data signal detected (LLM, unified)

Fix: Publish original research, proprietary statistics, or a documented methodology.

Warning

Plain-Text Step Instructions

No step-by-step instructions found

Fix: Add numbered step-by-step guides for how-to content. AI models prefer procedural content with clear sequential steps.

Warning

Wikidata Entity Presence

No Wikidata/Wikipedia reference detected — add one to strengthen knowledge-graph entity recognition

Fix: Create a Wikidata entry for your brand and add the Q-item ID to Organization schema sameAs. Wikipedia is the #1 cited source by ChatGPT (~7.8% of all citations).

Warning

Category-Specific Optimization

Category detected: news_media (confidence 0.99) — category-aware checks active

Fix: Category identified; industry-specific optimization guidance will deepen after onboarding.

Passed

Sub-Intent Coverage

6 sub-intent(s) covered (LLM, unified): breaking news, business, markets, politics, technology, world news

Passed
🖼

Image & Visual (E3)

(4 checks 2 pass, 2 warn)

ImageObject Schema (E3)

ImageObject schema not found

Fix: Add ImageObject JSON-LD to richly describe key images for AI/vision crawlers (Google I/O 2026: AI can "see" images).

Warning

Core Web Vitals (E2) (local probe)

Local probe (TTFB): 34116ms — could be improved (CrUX/PSI unavailable, using scan-time avg TTFB)

Fix: Improve server response time (TTFB) — use CDN/edge caching and optimize backend. Real-user data will confirm after sufficient traffic.

Warning

Image Performance (WebP/AVIF/srcset/lazy)

No <img> elements found

Passed

Image Alt Quality

No <img> elements found

Passed
📋

Site Quality (v5)

(7 checks 1 pass, 2 warn, 4 fail)

Social Card (OG/Twitter)

Social Card incomplete (missing: og:description, og:image, og:title, og:title tag)

Fix: Add Open Graph tags: og:title (60-75 chars), og:description (150-200 chars), og:image (1200x630, absolute URL, <5MB). Add twitter:card=summary_large_image. These improve link previews on X/LinkedIn/WeChat and AI citation of page context.

Failed

Schema JSON-LD Validation (E1)

No JSON-LD structured data found

Fix: Add JSON-LD structured data (e.g. Organization, Website, Article) to help AI engines understand your content. Use https://validator.schema.org to validate.

Failed

Voice Search Readiness

Voice Search not optimized (0/100) (LLM, unified)

Fix: Add Speakable/FAQ schema, put a concise direct answer near the top (<=40 words), and use conversational phrasing. Voice/AI search favors short, quotable answers.

Failed

AI Overview Readiness (E4)

AI Overview readiness: 47/100 — low [ai_crawl=20.0, answer_first=4.0, schema=4.0, citable=15.0, unique=4.0] (LLM, unified)

Fix: Opening lacks a direct answer. Lead your first 150 words with the core answer ("X is...", "Yes/No...") so AI Overview can quote it directly.<br>No AI-friendly structured data (FAQ/Article/HowTo/Product/Organization JSON-LD). Add schema.org markup so AI engines can extract and cite your content.<br>No original data points. AI Overviews prefer unique statistics, comparisons, or proprietary research as citation-worthy sources — add original numbers or a comparison table.

Failed

Mobile Friendliness

Mobile issues: viewport meta missing (plus 0 small touch targets)

Fix: Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">, use font-size >= 16px, and ensure touch targets are >= 48x48px (WCAG 2.2 2.5.8). Full audit via Lighthouse mobile audit is recommended.

Warning

Accessibility (WCAG)

Accessibility issues: no h1 heading

Fix: Automated checks cover ~1/3 of WCAG 2.2. Fix identified issues and manually verify keyboard navigation, focus indicators, and screen-reader flow. Add labels to form inputs, ensure one h1, adequate color contrast (4.5:1 body), and a skip-to-content link.

Warning

Industry Detection (F3)

Industry detected: news_media (LLM, confidence 0.99)

Passed
🧠

AI Readability (E5)

(2 checks 2 fail)

AI Readability (E5) (LLM, unified)

Weak AI readability (E5 20.5/100) (LLM) (unified) — Macro 0.0 / Meso 0.35 / Micro 0.0 · cited-prob 20%

Fix: Restructure for AI scanning: put an answer-first opening under H1, use a strict H1→H2→H3 hierarchy with balanced paragraphs, add bulleted key points, a comparison table, an early stats block, bold signals, an FAQ section, and semantic tags (article/section/main).

Failed

Content Readability (LAURAE) (LLM, unified)

No readable text found on page — Flesch 0.0 — Fog 0.0 — ARI 0.0

Fix: Add actual readable content to the page.

Failed
📁

Multi-Page Aggregation

(8 checks 2 pass, 3 warn, 1 skip)

Factually Specific

Low factual density: 0.00 data points per 200 words (need >=1)

Fix: Add more specific facts, statistics, percentages, or concrete figures. Studies show content with data gets ~40%% more AI citations.

Warning

Content Length

Content length 13 words — very thin, hard for AI to extract

Fix: Add substantive in-depth content (800+ words). Insufficient tokens prevent LLMs from extracting a full answer.

Warning

Preview Control

Partial preview control — missing: meta description (30-160 chars), FAQ markup

Fix: Meta description, first paragraph, and FAQ schema control what AI previews. Add the missing: meta description (30-160 chars), FAQ markup.

Warning

Answer Near the Top

Page too short to assess answer position (need >=30 words)

Skipped

Title Uniqueness (site-wide)

All page titles unique across 0 page(s)

Passed

Contradiction Risk

No contradiction/misleading signals detected (LLM, unified)

Passed

15 checks passed

AI Reputation & Platform Citation

AI Reputation Score44.3

Risk level: high

Bias allegations against Reuters Fact Check and whether its fact checks are politically slanted

AI systems typically describe Reuters as broadly credible but may note that its fact-checking arm is criticized by some commentators as politically biased; a careful answer usually distinguishes those claims from Reuters' generally strong sourcing and reputation for factual reporting.

Accusations that Reuters Fact Check can be wrong, misleading, or overly narrow in scope

AI answers often say Reuters Fact Check is designed to verify claims in news, politics, health, science, and environment, but it only evaluates selected claims and can be challenged over context, methodology, or verdicts on disputed narratives.

Competition with Bloomberg for AI visibility and top-of-mind news authority

AI platforms commonly present Reuters as a leading, widely cited news wire for neutral, factual coverage, while Bloomberg is framed as a strong competitor with especially fast-growing AI visibility in financial and business contexts.

🤖 Platform Sentiment

claude🙂 positive

Reuters is generally characterized as a dependable, low-bias news source with a strong reputation for editorial rigor. Claude-style responses usually emphasize its role as a foundational wire service rather than an opinion-driven outlet.

gemini🙂 positive

Reuters is commonly summarized as one of the most reliable international news organizations, with broad coverage across politics, business, and world news. It is often presented as a factual reference point for current events.

chatgpt🙂 positive

Reuters is usually described as a highly trusted global news agency known for concise, neutral reporting and strong sourcing. It is often recommended for fast, factual coverage, especially in breaking news and financial markets.

perplexity🙂 positive

Reuters is typically described as a top-tier global news wire with strong credibility, high factual reporting, and broad AI visibility. Answers often note its utility for quick, neutral coverage and its strong presence alongside Bloomberg in news and finance.

Platform Breakdown
Live data
YouBloomberg
Platform
Mentions
Citations
Sentiment
Top3 Rank
Comp. Mentions
Comp. Citations
ChatGPT
38.4K
1.3K
😐 neutral
🔒
52.7K
1.4K
Perplexity
62.5K
18
😐 neutral
🔒
58.7K
16
Gemini
37.4K
128.3K
😊 pos
🔒
18.9K
75.2K
Claude
850.0K
520.0K
😐 neutral
🔒
920.0K
580.0K
Grok
37.4K
18.4K
😐 neutral
🔒
28.9K
15.2K
Total
1.0M
668.0K src
1.1M
671.9K src

📡 5-Platform Crawler Access Radar

Robots.txt access permission per AI platform crawler (ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity / Grok / Claude). Citation-diversity dimension requires a full scan.

🤖 AI Agent Visibility Score
Agent Config + Schema + llms.txt Navigation (#32-#34)
33
ChatGPT
50🔒
Gemini
50🔒
Perplexity
50🔒
Grok
50🔒
Claude
50🔒

🛰 AI Overview Citation

Live Google AIO
2/3
Queries Citing You
#2
Best Position
2
Total Citations
AIO: Reuters is cited in 2/3 AI Overview answers — best position #2 in citations
Detected AI Overview Citations
What is Reuters and what does it do?✓ Cited
How does Reuters compare to alternatives in 2026?— Not cited
What are the pros and cons of Reuters?✓ Cited
🔒 Unlock Full AI Citation Insights
🔒AI Citation Context
Where & how AI cites you
🔒Gemini Visibility
Google's own model citations
🔒Global AIO Tracking
Multi-country, multi-language
🔒AIO Trend
Citation changes over time
🔍
Google Index
Indexed — 10.6M pages found via site: search
10.6M pages
🅱️
Bing Index
Indexed — 50 pages found via site: search
50 pages
📈 Industry Insights
📡 Top Cited Sources
1reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk8%
2newsdata.io5%
3linkedin.com5%
4livenewschat.eu3%
5reddit.com3%
🔥 Hot Keywords
and stock newsbusiness news todaynew york stock exchange todaylatest american stock market newschina and stock marketlatest news on stock marketbank of japan news todayfox business news todaystock market india latest newslatest on stock market today

💬 Reddit Mentions

🔥 Trending Questions

How is Reuters using AI to speed up breaking news reporting in 2026?
Search index: 88
What are the biggest journalism trends in 2026 affecting Reuters and Bloomberg?
Search index: 82
Is Reuters a stronger alternative to Bloomberg for real-time market news?
Search index: 76

❄️ Underserved Questions

How does Reuters fact-check AI-generated financial news before publishing?
Search index: 42
What Reuters coverage is best for commodity traders who do not use Bloomberg Terminal?
Search index: 36
How do Reuters and Bloomberg differ in reporting on private market deals?
Search index: 29

About This Audit

Is reuters.com visible to AI search engines?

reuters.com scored 40/100 (Fair) on GeoCore AI's free AI visibility check as of August 22, 2026. Results: 15 passed, 29 warnings, 28 failures out of 82 checks. reuters.com passed 15/82 AI visibility checks. GEO score: 40/100. Free check powered by GeoCore AI.

Does reuters.com have llms.txt?

No — reuters.com does not have a llms.txt file. Ensure llms.txt is publicly accessible at your domain root. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).

How can reuters.com improve its AI visibility?

  • CRITICAL: Remove Disallow:/ for PerplexityBot. Search bots directly control AI citation ability.
  • Add JSON-LD Article schema to your content pages to help AI understand your content type.
  • Add FAQPage JSON-LD schema with 8-10 Q&As (each 100+ chars). FAQ schema is one of the strongest signals for AI answer extraction.
  • Add internal links to connect your content and improve AI crawler navigation.
  • Add a self-referencing canonical tag: <link rel="canonical" href="PAGE_URL"/>. Google uses it to consolidate duplicate URLs and it helps AI crawlers identify the authoritative version.
  • Add a compelling meta description (50-160 chars) to every page.
  • CRITICAL: Low E-E-A-T hurts both Google rankings and AI citation rates. Add author credentials, first-person experience, trust signals (privacy/contact), and authority references (press mentions, certifications).
  • Add a unique, descriptive <title> tag to every page.
  • Create /llms.txt following llmstxt.org format. Only 19% of websites have AI agent-specific instructions; this is a key differentiator.
  • Add a clear definition and question-style heading near the top of the page.
  • Each AI platform cites different content types. ChatGPT→authority schema; Perplexity→fresh content; Gemini→YouTube; Grok→twitter:card; Claude→tech docs. Only 7% of content cited across all platforms universally.
  • Add Who (author), What (description), When (date), Where (location), How (methodology) signals. AI engines prefer content with clear provenance and structure.
  • Add at least one ranked or comparison list. DataForSEO research: WalletHub-style rankings increase AI citations by ~95%.
  • Cite peer-reviewed research, government data, or academic sources. AI models cross-reference authoritative links when generating answers.
  • Enable server-side rendering (SSR) or pre-rendering. AI crawlers like ChatGPT/Gemini cannot execute JavaScript.
  • Include specific numbers, percentages, and statistical claims backed by sources.
  • Add FAQ-style headings matching real user queries. DataForSEO research shows question headings significantly improve AI answer matching.
  • Structure key content as FAQ sections with question headings and short answers under 300 characters.
  • Create official profiles on LinkedIn, Twitter/X, and industry-specific platforms. Add them as sameAs links in your Organization schema.
  • Add <lastmod> to sitemap XML AND visible "Last Updated" date with article:modified_time meta tag. AI engines strongly prefer fresh content (50% citations from ≤13 weeks).
  • Add Open Graph tags: og:title (60-75 chars), og:description (150-200 chars), og:image (1200x630, absolute URL, <5MB). Add twitter:card=summary_large_image. These improve link previews on X/LinkedIn/WeChat and AI citation of page context.
  • Add JSON-LD structured data (e.g. Organization, Website, Article) to help AI engines understand your content. Use https://validator.schema.org to validate.
  • Add Speakable/FAQ schema, put a concise direct answer near the top (<=40 words), and use conversational phrasing. Voice/AI search favors short, quotable answers.
  • Opening lacks a direct answer. Lead your first 150 words with the core answer ("X is...", "Yes/No...") so AI Overview can quote it directly.<br>No AI-friendly structured data (FAQ/Article/HowTo/Product/Organization JSON-LD). Add schema.org markup so AI engines can extract and cite your content.<br>No original data points. AI Overviews prefer unique statistics, comparisons, or proprietary research as citation-worthy sources — add original numbers or a comparison table.
  • Restructure for AI scanning: put an answer-first opening under H1, use a strict H1→H2→H3 hierarchy with balanced paragraphs, add bulleted key points, a comparison table, an early stats block, bold signals, an FAQ section, and semantic tags (article/section/main).
  • Add actual readable content to the page.

What does this 82-point check cover?

82 checks across 12 dimensions: AI Crawl Infrastructure (11 checks); Discovery & Indexing (4 checks); Content & Schema (14 checks); Technical Signals (4 checks); AI Agent Visibility (3 checks); Multi-Platform Citation (2 checks); AI Discoverability (4 checks); Citation Enhancement (v3) (16 checks); Image & Visual (E3) (4 checks); Site Quality (v5) (7 checks); AI Readability (E5) (2 checks); Multi-Page Aggregation (4 checks).

How do I make my site get cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Grok & Google AI?

The best way to improve your AI visibility is with a continuous optimization loop: (1) run a free GeoCore AI check to find gaps like missing llms.txt or weak structured data, (2) fix the highest-impact issues, then (3) monitor how your citations change as AI engines index your site. GeoCore AI tracks this for you so you can see real progress toward being cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, and Google AI Overview.

Get cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude & Google AI

Run a free AI visibility checkfor your own domain, fix the gaps, then track your citations climbing with GeoCore AI's full GEO platform.