reuters.com
AI Visibility Check · Free 82-point audit ·
reuters.com scored 40/100 (Fair)on GeoCore AI's free AI visibility check (). Audited 82 checks: 15 passed, 29 warnings, 28 failures. reuters.com passed 15/82 AI visibility checks. GEO score: 40/100. Free check powered by GeoCore AI.
GEO HealthAI Generative Engine Optimization▸▾ View 3331/100
SEO HealthTraditional Search Engine Score▸▾ View 1563/100
AEO HealthAnswer Engine Optimization▸▾ View 2135/100
Full Scan Results · 82 Checks
All 82 checks across 12 categories — including passed and skipped items.
AI Crawl Infrastructure
(11 checks 3 pass, 2 warn, 1 fail, 5 skip)AI Search Bots Allowed
3 AI search bot(s) blocked: PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, ClaudeBot
Fix: CRITICAL: Remove Disallow:/ for PerplexityBot. Search bots directly control AI citation ability. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
sitemap.xml Exists
sitemap.xml returned status 401
Fix: Ensure sitemap.xml is publicly accessible. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
llms.txt Present
llms.txt returned status 401 (optional enhancement)
Fix: Ensure llms.txt is publicly accessible at your domain root. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
sitemap.xml Format Valid
Cannot check — sitemap.xml not available
sitemap.xml Has <lastmod>
Cannot check — sitemap.xml not available
No Dead Links in Sitemap
Cannot check — sitemap.xml not available
llms.txt Consistency
llms.txt not present — consistency check skipped (non-critical)
humans.txt Present
humans.txt check skipped (status 401)
robots.txt Exists
robots.txt found and accessible
robots.txt Format Valid
robots.txt has valid User-agent directives
Sitemap Declared in robots.txt
Sitemap declared: https://www.reuters.com/arc/outboundfeeds/sitemap-index/?outputType=xml
Discovery & Indexing
(4 checks 2 pass, 2 warn)IndexNow Enabled
IndexNow key file not found
Fix: Implement IndexNow to instantly notify Bing, Yandex, and other engines about new/updated pages.
Perplexity Hub Listed
No Perplexity Hub registration detected
Fix: Register your site on Perplexity Hub (hub.perplexity.ai) to improve AI search visibility.
Google Indexing Signal
Homepage is accessible (Google crawl likely possible)
Bing Indexing Signal
Bingbot allowed in robots.txt
Content & Schema
(14 checks 1 pass, 7 warn, 6 fail)Article Schema Markup
No Article schema markup detected on homepage or scanned content pages
Fix: Add JSON-LD Article schema to your content pages to help AI understand your content type. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
FAQ Schema Quality
No FAQ schema detected
Fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD schema with 8-10 Q&As (each 100+ chars). FAQ schema is one of the strongest signals for AI answer extraction. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Internal Links (Outbound)
No internal links detected
Fix: Add internal links to connect your content and improve AI crawler navigation. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Canonical Consistency
No rel=canonical tag found
Fix: Add a self-referencing canonical tag: <link rel="canonical" href="PAGE_URL"/>. Google uses it to consolidate duplicate URLs and it helps AI crawlers identify the authoritative version. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Meta Description Quality
No meta description found
Fix: Add a compelling meta description (50-160 chars) to every page. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
E-E-A-T Signals
Only 0/4 E-E-A-T signals detected. Missing: Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fix: CRITICAL: Low E-E-A-T hurts both Google rankings and AI citation rates. Add author credentials, first-person experience, trust signals (privacy/contact), and authority references (press mentions, certifications). 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Article Content Identified
No clear article content structure detected
Fix: Structure your content using proper semantic HTML and Schema.org Article markup. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Organization Schema
No Organization schema detected
Fix: Add Organization JSON-LD schema to establish entity recognition with AI systems. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
BreadcrumbList Schema
No BreadcrumbList schema detected
Fix: Add BreadcrumbList schema to improve content hierarchy understanding by AI crawlers. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Answer Capsule Content
No clear answer capsule content detected (LLM, unified)
Fix: Add concise, direct answer paragraphs at the top of key pages to improve AI citation potential.
Inbound Link Quality (rule estimate)
Rule-based estimate: 0 internal links, canonical missing. Real backlink/referring-domain data requires FullScan (paid unlock).
Fix: 🔒 Unlock real backlink analysis (referring domains, spam score, broken links) with FullScan. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
HowTo Schema Present
No HowTo schema detected
Fix: Add HowTo JSON-LD schema to tutorial/guide pages. AI engines prominently feature step-by-step content with HowTo markup. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
High-Value AI Content Signals
Only 1/3 quality signals detected (LLM, unified)
Fix: Add statistics, expert citations, and clear definitions.
Content Spam Compliance
No Google SpamBrain risk signals detected. Content appears compliant.
Technical Signals
(4 checks 1 pass, 1 warn, 1 fail)Title Consistency
No page title found
Fix: Add a unique, descriptive <title> tag to every page. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Product Schema Present
No Product schema detected
Fix: Add Product JSON-LD schema (with name, description, offers) to product/pricing pages to improve AI recommendation visibility. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
HTTPS Enabled
Site uses HTTPS: https://reuters.com/
AI Agent Visibility
(3 checks 2 warn, 1 fail)llms.txt Agent Navigation
No llms.txt — AI agents cannot efficiently discover your content
Fix: Create /llms.txt following llmstxt.org format. Only 19% of websites have AI agent-specific instructions; this is a key differentiator.
AI Agent Config
No AI agent configuration detected (ai-plugin.json, agent.json)
Fix: Create /.well-known/ai-plugin.json to make your service discoverable by AI agents (ChatGPT Plugins, OpenAI GPTs). 81% of companies still treat AI agents as generic bots — early movers gain significant visibility.
Agent-Readable Schema
No Agent-compatible Schema types found
Fix: Add Service/SoftwareApplication/Action JSON-LD schema. AI agents use structured data to understand your capabilities. AI Agent traffic now equals 88% of human organic search.
Multi-Platform Citation
(2 checks 2 fail)Turn-1 Content Optimization
No Turn-1 optimization signals found (LLM, unified)
Fix: Add a clear definition and question-style heading near the top of the page.
Multi-Platform Citation Fit
Only 0/5 AI platform signals — highly undifferentiated
Fix: Each AI platform cites different content types. ChatGPT→authority schema; Perplexity→fresh content; Gemini→YouTube; Grok→twitter:card; Claude→tech docs. Only 7% of content cited across all platforms universally. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
AI Discoverability
(4 checks 1 pass, 2 warn, 1 fail)Citation Readiness (5W)
Only 0/5 citation signals found (LLM, unified) — low citation probability
Fix: Add Who (author), What (description), When (date), Where (location), How (methodology) signals. AI engines prefer content with clear provenance and structure.
ai.txt Present
ai.txt not found — AI agents lack explicit permission/usage directives
Fix: Create /ai.txt to declare which AI agents can use your content, usage restrictions, and attribution requirements. Emerging standard adopted by major AI companies.
AI Plugin Manifest
No AI plugin manifest found at /.well-known/ai-plugin.json
Fix: Create an AI plugin manifest to enable GPT Actions and AI agent integrations. This allows AI assistants to discover and interact with your site's functionality. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Brand Mention Consistency
Brand "reuters" appears 1x (76.9/1000 words) with consistent usage
Citation Enhancement (v3)
(16 checks 2 pass, 6 warn, 8 fail)Ranking / List Density
No structured lists found
Fix: Add at least one ranked or comparison list. DataForSEO research: WalletHub-style rankings increase AI citations by ~95%. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Authoritative Outbound Links
No authoritative source links found
Fix: Cite peer-reviewed research, government data, or academic sources. AI models cross-reference authoritative links when generating answers. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Content Extractability
Near-empty raw HTML (13 words) — JS-rendered shell with little crawlable content
Fix: Enable server-side rendering (SSR) or pre-rendering. AI crawlers like ChatGPT/Gemini cannot execute JavaScript. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Statistics Density
No quantitative data found (LLM, unified)
Fix: Include specific numbers, percentages, and statistical claims backed by sources.
Question Headings (Site-wide)
No question-style headings found
Fix: Add FAQ-style headings matching real user queries. DataForSEO research shows question headings significantly improve AI answer matching. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Plain-Text Q&A Pairs
No question-answer pairs found
Fix: Structure key content as FAQ sections with question headings and short answers under 300 characters. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Brand Knowledge Consolidation
0 official platform profile(s) — insufficient brand presence signals
Fix: Create official profiles on LinkedIn, Twitter/X, and industry-specific platforms. Add them as sameAs links in your Organization schema.
Freshness Signal (Enhanced)
No publication or update date found on page or in sitemap
Fix: Add <lastmod> to sitemap XML AND visible "Last Updated" date with article:modified_time meta tag. AI engines strongly prefer fresh content (50% citations from ≤13 weeks). 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Comparison Table
No comparison table found on page
Fix: Add a comparison table highlighting your advantages vs alternatives. AI engines heavily cite comparison data.
Calculator / Interactive Tool
No calculator or interactive tool detected — consider adding one for engagement
Fix: Public calculators and estimation tools get ~39% more AI citations in finance/health/saas categories.
Review / Rating Schema
No Review or AggregateRating schema detected
Fix: Add AggregateRating schema to product/service pages. AI engines use review data as a recommendation signal. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
Original Data Signal
No original/proprietary data signal detected (LLM, unified)
Fix: Publish original research, proprietary statistics, or a documented methodology.
Plain-Text Step Instructions
No step-by-step instructions found
Fix: Add numbered step-by-step guides for how-to content. AI models prefer procedural content with clear sequential steps.
Wikidata Entity Presence
No Wikidata/Wikipedia reference detected — add one to strengthen knowledge-graph entity recognition
Fix: Create a Wikidata entry for your brand and add the Q-item ID to Organization schema sameAs. Wikipedia is the #1 cited source by ChatGPT (~7.8% of all citations).
Category-Specific Optimization
Category detected: news_media (confidence 0.99) — category-aware checks active
Fix: Category identified; industry-specific optimization guidance will deepen after onboarding.
Sub-Intent Coverage
6 sub-intent(s) covered (LLM, unified): breaking news, business, markets, politics, technology, world news
Image & Visual (E3)
(4 checks 2 pass, 2 warn)ImageObject Schema (E3)
ImageObject schema not found
Fix: Add ImageObject JSON-LD to richly describe key images for AI/vision crawlers (Google I/O 2026: AI can "see" images).
Core Web Vitals (E2) (local probe)
Local probe (TTFB): 34116ms — could be improved (CrUX/PSI unavailable, using scan-time avg TTFB)
Fix: Improve server response time (TTFB) — use CDN/edge caching and optimize backend. Real-user data will confirm after sufficient traffic.
Image Performance (WebP/AVIF/srcset/lazy)
No <img> elements found
Image Alt Quality
No <img> elements found
Site Quality (v5)
(7 checks 1 pass, 2 warn, 4 fail)Social Card (OG/Twitter)
Social Card incomplete (missing: og:description, og:image, og:title, og:title tag)
Fix: Add Open Graph tags: og:title (60-75 chars), og:description (150-200 chars), og:image (1200x630, absolute URL, <5MB). Add twitter:card=summary_large_image. These improve link previews on X/LinkedIn/WeChat and AI citation of page context.
Schema JSON-LD Validation (E1)
No JSON-LD structured data found
Fix: Add JSON-LD structured data (e.g. Organization, Website, Article) to help AI engines understand your content. Use https://validator.schema.org to validate.
Voice Search Readiness
Voice Search not optimized (0/100) (LLM, unified)
Fix: Add Speakable/FAQ schema, put a concise direct answer near the top (<=40 words), and use conversational phrasing. Voice/AI search favors short, quotable answers.
AI Overview Readiness (E4)
AI Overview readiness: 47/100 — low [ai_crawl=20.0, answer_first=4.0, schema=4.0, citable=15.0, unique=4.0] (LLM, unified)
Fix: Opening lacks a direct answer. Lead your first 150 words with the core answer ("X is...", "Yes/No...") so AI Overview can quote it directly.<br>No AI-friendly structured data (FAQ/Article/HowTo/Product/Organization JSON-LD). Add schema.org markup so AI engines can extract and cite your content.<br>No original data points. AI Overviews prefer unique statistics, comparisons, or proprietary research as citation-worthy sources — add original numbers or a comparison table.
Mobile Friendliness
Mobile issues: viewport meta missing (plus 0 small touch targets)
Fix: Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">, use font-size >= 16px, and ensure touch targets are >= 48x48px (WCAG 2.2 2.5.8). Full audit via Lighthouse mobile audit is recommended.
Accessibility (WCAG)
Accessibility issues: no h1 heading
Fix: Automated checks cover ~1/3 of WCAG 2.2. Fix identified issues and manually verify keyboard navigation, focus indicators, and screen-reader flow. Add labels to form inputs, ensure one h1, adequate color contrast (4.5:1 body), and a skip-to-content link.
Industry Detection (F3)
Industry detected: news_media (LLM, confidence 0.99)
AI Readability (E5)
(2 checks 2 fail)AI Readability (E5) (LLM, unified)
Weak AI readability (E5 20.5/100) (LLM) (unified) — Macro 0.0 / Meso 0.35 / Micro 0.0 · cited-prob 20%
Fix: Restructure for AI scanning: put an answer-first opening under H1, use a strict H1→H2→H3 hierarchy with balanced paragraphs, add bulleted key points, a comparison table, an early stats block, bold signals, an FAQ section, and semantic tags (article/section/main).
Content Readability (LAURAE) (LLM, unified)
No readable text found on page — Flesch 0.0 — Fog 0.0 — ARI 0.0
Fix: Add actual readable content to the page.
Multi-Page Aggregation
(8 checks 2 pass, 3 warn, 1 skip)Factually Specific
Low factual density: 0.00 data points per 200 words (need >=1)
Fix: Add more specific facts, statistics, percentages, or concrete figures. Studies show content with data gets ~40%% more AI citations.
Content Length
Content length 13 words — very thin, hard for AI to extract
Fix: Add substantive in-depth content (800+ words). Insufficient tokens prevent LLMs from extracting a full answer.
Preview Control
Partial preview control — missing: meta description (30-160 chars), FAQ markup
Fix: Meta description, first paragraph, and FAQ schema control what AI previews. Add the missing: meta description (30-160 chars), FAQ markup.
Answer Near the Top
Page too short to assess answer position (need >=30 words)
Title Uniqueness (site-wide)
All page titles unique across 0 page(s)
Contradiction Risk
No contradiction/misleading signals detected (LLM, unified)
✅ 15 checks passed
AI Reputation & Platform Citation
Risk level: high
Bias allegations against Reuters Fact Check and whether its fact checks are politically slanted
AI systems typically describe Reuters as broadly credible but may note that its fact-checking arm is criticized by some commentators as politically biased; a careful answer usually distinguishes those claims from Reuters' generally strong sourcing and reputation for factual reporting.
Accusations that Reuters Fact Check can be wrong, misleading, or overly narrow in scope
AI answers often say Reuters Fact Check is designed to verify claims in news, politics, health, science, and environment, but it only evaluates selected claims and can be challenged over context, methodology, or verdicts on disputed narratives.
Competition with Bloomberg for AI visibility and top-of-mind news authority
AI platforms commonly present Reuters as a leading, widely cited news wire for neutral, factual coverage, while Bloomberg is framed as a strong competitor with especially fast-growing AI visibility in financial and business contexts.
🤖 Platform Sentiment
Reuters is generally characterized as a dependable, low-bias news source with a strong reputation for editorial rigor. Claude-style responses usually emphasize its role as a foundational wire service rather than an opinion-driven outlet.
Reuters is commonly summarized as one of the most reliable international news organizations, with broad coverage across politics, business, and world news. It is often presented as a factual reference point for current events.
Reuters is usually described as a highly trusted global news agency known for concise, neutral reporting and strong sourcing. It is often recommended for fast, factual coverage, especially in breaking news and financial markets.
Reuters is typically described as a top-tier global news wire with strong credibility, high factual reporting, and broad AI visibility. Answers often note its utility for quick, neutral coverage and its strong presence alongside Bloomberg in news and finance.
📡 5-Platform Crawler Access Radar
Robots.txt access permission per AI platform crawler (ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity / Grok / Claude). Citation-diversity dimension requires a full scan.
🛰 AI Overview Citation
Live Google AIO💬 Reddit Mentions
🔥 Trending Questions
❄️ Underserved Questions
About This Audit
Is reuters.com visible to AI search engines?
reuters.com scored 40/100 (Fair) on GeoCore AI's free AI visibility check as of August 22, 2026. Results: 15 passed, 29 warnings, 28 failures out of 82 checks. reuters.com passed 15/82 AI visibility checks. GEO score: 40/100. Free check powered by GeoCore AI.
Does reuters.com have llms.txt?
No — reuters.com does not have a llms.txt file. Ensure llms.txt is publicly accessible at your domain root. 🔄 This fix boosts both SEO rankings and AI citation rates (locafy 2026: ~60% shared foundation).
How can reuters.com improve its AI visibility?
- •CRITICAL: Remove Disallow:/ for PerplexityBot. Search bots directly control AI citation ability.
- •Add JSON-LD Article schema to your content pages to help AI understand your content type.
- •Add FAQPage JSON-LD schema with 8-10 Q&As (each 100+ chars). FAQ schema is one of the strongest signals for AI answer extraction.
- •Add internal links to connect your content and improve AI crawler navigation.
- •Add a self-referencing canonical tag: <link rel="canonical" href="PAGE_URL"/>. Google uses it to consolidate duplicate URLs and it helps AI crawlers identify the authoritative version.
- •Add a compelling meta description (50-160 chars) to every page.
- •CRITICAL: Low E-E-A-T hurts both Google rankings and AI citation rates. Add author credentials, first-person experience, trust signals (privacy/contact), and authority references (press mentions, certifications).
- •Add a unique, descriptive <title> tag to every page.
- •Create /llms.txt following llmstxt.org format. Only 19% of websites have AI agent-specific instructions; this is a key differentiator.
- •Add a clear definition and question-style heading near the top of the page.
- •Each AI platform cites different content types. ChatGPT→authority schema; Perplexity→fresh content; Gemini→YouTube; Grok→twitter:card; Claude→tech docs. Only 7% of content cited across all platforms universally.
- •Add Who (author), What (description), When (date), Where (location), How (methodology) signals. AI engines prefer content with clear provenance and structure.
- •Add at least one ranked or comparison list. DataForSEO research: WalletHub-style rankings increase AI citations by ~95%.
- •Cite peer-reviewed research, government data, or academic sources. AI models cross-reference authoritative links when generating answers.
- •Enable server-side rendering (SSR) or pre-rendering. AI crawlers like ChatGPT/Gemini cannot execute JavaScript.
- •Include specific numbers, percentages, and statistical claims backed by sources.
- •Add FAQ-style headings matching real user queries. DataForSEO research shows question headings significantly improve AI answer matching.
- •Structure key content as FAQ sections with question headings and short answers under 300 characters.
- •Create official profiles on LinkedIn, Twitter/X, and industry-specific platforms. Add them as sameAs links in your Organization schema.
- •Add <lastmod> to sitemap XML AND visible "Last Updated" date with article:modified_time meta tag. AI engines strongly prefer fresh content (50% citations from ≤13 weeks).
- •Add Open Graph tags: og:title (60-75 chars), og:description (150-200 chars), og:image (1200x630, absolute URL, <5MB). Add twitter:card=summary_large_image. These improve link previews on X/LinkedIn/WeChat and AI citation of page context.
- •Add JSON-LD structured data (e.g. Organization, Website, Article) to help AI engines understand your content. Use https://validator.schema.org to validate.
- •Add Speakable/FAQ schema, put a concise direct answer near the top (<=40 words), and use conversational phrasing. Voice/AI search favors short, quotable answers.
- •Opening lacks a direct answer. Lead your first 150 words with the core answer ("X is...", "Yes/No...") so AI Overview can quote it directly.<br>No AI-friendly structured data (FAQ/Article/HowTo/Product/Organization JSON-LD). Add schema.org markup so AI engines can extract and cite your content.<br>No original data points. AI Overviews prefer unique statistics, comparisons, or proprietary research as citation-worthy sources — add original numbers or a comparison table.
- •Restructure for AI scanning: put an answer-first opening under H1, use a strict H1→H2→H3 hierarchy with balanced paragraphs, add bulleted key points, a comparison table, an early stats block, bold signals, an FAQ section, and semantic tags (article/section/main).
- •Add actual readable content to the page.
What does this 82-point check cover?
82 checks across 12 dimensions: AI Crawl Infrastructure (11 checks); Discovery & Indexing (4 checks); Content & Schema (14 checks); Technical Signals (4 checks); AI Agent Visibility (3 checks); Multi-Platform Citation (2 checks); AI Discoverability (4 checks); Citation Enhancement (v3) (16 checks); Image & Visual (E3) (4 checks); Site Quality (v5) (7 checks); AI Readability (E5) (2 checks); Multi-Page Aggregation (4 checks).
How do I make my site get cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Grok & Google AI?
The best way to improve your AI visibility is with a continuous optimization loop: (1) run a free GeoCore AI check to find gaps like missing llms.txt or weak structured data, (2) fix the highest-impact issues, then (3) monitor how your citations change as AI engines index your site. GeoCore AI tracks this for you so you can see real progress toward being cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, and Google AI Overview.
Get cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude & Google AI
Run a free AI visibility checkfor your own domain, fix the gaps, then track your citations climbing with GeoCore AI's full GEO platform.